I have only played Frooks 8 times at this point but the ones I have played have really caused me to question some of these rules. Although it is the closest thing to Big Brother on the site, in my opinion it could take a lot more from BB and be SO much better.
First of all, the game is SO friggin difficult for newer players. Many of these people have had friends on here for over 10 years that will save them literally no matter what you do!!! I have to try so hard to get into people's good graces, and when I manage to I am not rewarded and instead taken out because of these pre mades. This is the kind of shit that makes people want to make multis to have a chance ever.
Also, the comps are always won by the same 2 or occasionally 3 people because they have been practicing these comps for AGES while newer players may be just trying it out so they have NO chance to get the veto they need. Also, the fact that the HOH is based on the algo means that players with premades can just plus each other and give the HOH to each other every time like a popularity contest!
Finally, even when a newer player is able to play the social game of their lives, has jury votes lined up, AND is able to make up for not being able to win comps: they go out in final 4 because they lose a friggin comp and algo screws you over. You should be able to win the game without getting any HOH's or vetos, that's why Big Brother is so much better than these shows where you only win by winning comps.
Dr. Will showed us that the real power lies with those that don't hold the perceived power, and that is not possible in Frooks. The game is meant to be a social/strategic game, so at least the final 4 should be changed so that new players have a chance!!!!
