James: I think you played a very average game. Clearly you played better than the majority of the people here, but I can’t really find a word to describe your game other than simplistic and average or some synonym like that. You laid out your game nicely in your speech, but there doesn’t appear to be many ups and downs, or obstacles that stood in your way. It feels like you had your alliance, and stuck with them to the end. I’m not saying that’s a bad thing because there are plenty of survivor winners that have won that way, but it’s not the best thing in my opinion. Can you tell me why your consistent, yet simplistic gameplay is more deserving of a win?
I completely understand why you would think that to be honest. I believe my gameplay deserves me the win because I made sure I was in a position each tribal so that I had no concern going into it. Granted, I was almost blindsided one tribal, but since then I made sure I was doing well enough socially that each tribal I knew I was going to be safe, which then gave me room to push forward my own ideas, and get out the people who were against me most that point in the game such as yourself, coincidentally. Like I'm not sure if I was your biggest target, I doubt I was, but we had spoken the least so I had to get you out here to continue ensuring I was in a comfortable position going into F5. Hope that answers it!