~Mearl Pt. 2~
You're right, I didn't show up to challenges. I think that that's one of my biggest mistakes. And you're also right about me not being able to talk a lot of the time. As a lot of you know, there is life outside of Tengaged. And like I said in my opening statement, you guys as jurors need to be open to acknowledging the fact that we, the final three, are humans and are not always able to be online for things. The times that challenges were hosted weren't the best for me, and I don't think that my real-life obligations should be a serious factor in your votes tonight. I did what I could and I feel I did it well; I only lost the spamming immunity by one post at the last second, and I won final immunity. As for not being available to talk... I guess all I can say is that I'm not the same Tengaged user I used to be. I wasn't always online to talk to people because I had things to do outside of the site: friends, my boyfriend, and social events just to list a few things. I definitely made an effort to talk to people most of the time. You guys can sit here and say I played an awful social game for being bad at responding sometimes but let me ask you this: if that was true, then why I did I have virtually unbreakable trust from so many of you? You guys told me things and kept going to bat for me, so can you really say my social game was that terrible?
As for sheeping, I'm confused to who I sheeped? Are you referring to yourself, Fred, and Brady? You guys were on three different sides of the spectrum, so how is it possible for me to sheep all three of you? I didn't even always vote with you, Mearl, and I was one of the most active voices in my alliance. I don't think it's fair to classify me as a coattail rider for not playing a flashy game like you, Brady, or Robby. I played hard, I thought for myself, and I stayed true to me. I did my best, and that's all you can ask from me.
Now that I'm done with that whole fucking essay, I'll answer your question. So let's say the final seven was me, you, Fred, Kevin, Tom, Robby, and Smitty. This would have been my ideal scenario as I would've had the two titans, you and Fred, going after each other and nobody would be focused on me. At this point the groups would have been me/Fred/Kevin and then Robby/smitty/Tom with Mearl in the middle. At this point I would have used Kevin and Robby's relationship to pull him in and vote out you, Mearl, as you are good at challenged and would beat any of us. At final six I would try to vote out Robby as he's one of the bigger threats in the cast. Final five being me, Tom, Kevin, Smitty, and Fred, I would definitely have targeted Tom as I think he would have had a solid case to win. In final four, I would have taken out Fred as I think he did play a strong game and might beat me. That would have left me in the most ideal situation of a final three consisting of myself, Smitty, and Kevin. This was my plan going into the Lord vote, and when it didn't go through I was forced to reevaluate.