1. why are people mad Laurel got the final vote? Like what would the alternative have been??? Revote would've resulted in another tie I'm sure, and fire would've been RIDICULOUS. Maybe it's just the casuals that are mad about this but seriously it's not like the vote was 1-0, it was 6-5.
2. BRING BACK THE OLD JURY DELIBERATIONS FORMAT. PERIOD. the outwit, outplay, outlast thing doesn't even make sense and literally the highlight of final tribals is seeing bitter jurors be petty as hell. this new format makes the deliberations super messy and scattered, and we don't even get to hear from everyone (e.g chelsea, libby, jenna, half the damn jury)
3. BRING BACK THE OLD REUNION. ENOUGH SIA ENOUGH ADVERTISEMENTS LET ME TALK TO THE DAMN CAST. (though i will admit there probably wasn't a lot of drama this season to talk about)
4. overall this season was meh but the final episode was definitely a highlight. dom's move was huge and the tie jury was awesome.
5. sebastian is annoying and should never be allowed to play survivor again.
6. people to bring back IMO: dom, libby, stephanie, laurel, michael
sound off in the comments i'm curious ur thoughts.
damn I am a little disappointed... but not surprised. overall I would say Good winner. Kaela is a beast. Paras is a great player.
1. Part of me understands that Paras did play a better social game, and that was evident in the jury speeches. Like girl u don't insult the jury when ur trying to get their votes...........
2. But its especially frustrating when it sounds like the jury was always going to vote against Kaela, whether that be Derrick and Kaela or Paras and Kaela. Paras having Maddy, Ryan and Will in the jury house I think made a big difference that made it more frustrating as a viewer. some would call that jury management tho idk
3. Part of me is happy Kaela didn't win final HOH and cut Derrick because it sounds like she would've lost anyways and it would have been more frustrating maybe??
4. I respect Paras's game and I honestly saw her winning from the beginning, and I am happy she atleast won the last two HOHs so it feels as tho she's a little more deserving
5. This seems to be a common trend these days in the BB world.... Ross vs Marissa, Paul vs Josh, the fact that Ika was probably never going to win BBCAN5..... bitter juries are rampant
6. I also am a firm believer that their is an absolute grey area between 'bitter juries' and 'jury management'. It is not always just one, though I will say this was leaning more towards jury management rather than for example Paul vs Josh I would call bitter jury.
7. I think this is the best final 2 that REALLY represented the season in a while and I think that should count for something. I feel like a large majority of people agreed at F5 that Paras or Kaela needed to win the game so it was pretty cool to see them both in the final 2. Kaela is by far the best runner up BBCAN has seen.
some of y'all are so predictable... like OF COURSE u don't like Ross and Marissa because they've been in power and played well and haven't had to really sweat all season because they've won competitions and put themselves in good positions to move forward in the game. This happens every year and I get it, it doesn't make good TV when the same people control the house every week.... but seriously if that's your only reason to not like someone y'all need a more convincing argument. like convince me not to like them in the comments i'm actually curious!! they aren't even my favourites but truly they haven't done anything... atleast with James he's actually arrogant and unlikeable.
here are my rankings :)
1. Omarosa
2. Ari
3. Ross
4. Brandi
5. Marissa
6. Mark
7. James
