damn I am a little disappointed... but not surprised. overall I would say Good winner. Kaela is a beast. Paras is a great player.
1. Part of me understands that Paras did play a better social game, and that was evident in the jury speeches. Like girl u don't insult the jury when ur trying to get their votes...........
2. But its especially frustrating when it sounds like the jury was always going to vote against Kaela, whether that be Derrick and Kaela or Paras and Kaela. Paras having Maddy, Ryan and Will in the jury house I think made a big difference that made it more frustrating as a viewer. some would call that jury management tho idk
3. Part of me is happy Kaela didn't win final HOH and cut Derrick because it sounds like she would've lost anyways and it would have been more frustrating maybe??
4. I respect Paras's game and I honestly saw her winning from the beginning, and I am happy she atleast won the last two HOHs so it feels as tho she's a little more deserving
5. This seems to be a common trend these days in the BB world.... Ross vs Marissa, Paul vs Josh, the fact that Ika was probably never going to win BBCAN5..... bitter juries are rampant
6. I also am a firm believer that their is an absolute grey area between 'bitter juries' and 'jury management'. It is not always just one, though I will say this was leaning more towards jury management rather than for example Paul vs Josh I would call bitter jury.
7. I think this is the best final 2 that REALLY represented the season in a while and I think that should count for something. I feel like a large majority of people agreed at F5 that Paras or Kaela needed to win the game so it was pretty cool to see them both in the final 2. Kaela is by far the best runner up BBCAN has seen.
