I have different questions for each of you. I haven't made my mind up, but I'm conflicted between two of you unless the other says something drastically mind-changing:
Steel: Your physical game was impeccable. Seriously, hats off for it! As i waited for you all to finish, the one thing I truly wanted to see was a tribal in which you weren't safe so that I could see your social/strategic games at play. The idol saved you, but I was still able to see that you were voted unanimously against (apart from yourself, of course). Why should I vote you DESPITE the fact that you would have gone at 5?
Clark: I almost feel like you were absent for the challenges. While it was impressive that you dodged tribals back to back like it was nobody's business, I feel that that your "everyone vote me i hate you" game was a bit 1-dimensional. Why should you win despite your lack of physical game?
JT: Congrats, ally! I get and do appreciate the in-between strategy, but I almost feel like you played too safe. To me, it seems as though you positioned yourself to do as little as possible and avoid having to put any work into getting here. I admire it, but why should I reward you when others worked harder to get here and almost took you here?
Congrats all for the final 3, and obviously you're better than I for being here :) While I'm criticizing your games a bit, I want you all to know that I admire that you all made it here! Good luck, and may the best player win!