As someone who has no interest in winning I Cba with saving face and feel it's dramatically important to respond to laughable claims rather than to stay silent and try not to turn off jury votes
Brady, you are proving to us all how out of touch you really are with not just this game but the whole game of survivor itself. You're calling us sheep and goats and suggesting that somehow taking you out was a terrible move... The irony being that last tribal Bob voted in the minority and you + the rest of us voted in the majority. Had Bob gone this tribal it would be an example of no moves being made ... but instead you got blindsided into a tie and decide to throw out any single survivor term 101 out of your ass hoping one of them sticks to us when all it did was dig your hole deeper than it was.
So no, you can't call people goats or sheep or tell them to make a move after they just ousted the individual who they worked with the previous round. If by making a move you mean like what you did to Erik or what others did to Qaz... then again Id laugh because the difference between that "move" and this one is yours was badly timed for your own games and too heavily dependent on looking like a player, whereas ours is bound to pay off in the long run.
Just because things didn't go your way doesn't mean you control the jury, were an excellent player who got robbed and everyone against you is nothing but sheep and pathelogical liars.
Enjoy the jury and hopefully you'll be in good company there soon x