Hey guys.
I've read though this and think I am close to a decision but I want to ask a couple of questions first. Just for the record, I think you all played good games and I respect all of your game plays.
Firstly, DBW I have a couple of things I want to ask you.
To start off with, I want to congratulate you on a good game. You had control of a major alliance for a large part of the game and had a good immunity streak but I do have a couple of problems with your game. Firstly, as soon as Sarah went, you where never in control. You had no influence in the game as the moves where all obvious and clear. If any point you had lost a challenge after that you WOULD of gone home. No doubt in my mind. That is the reason why I am struggling to give my vote to you. You relied heavily on the twist of the season and if it wasn't for the the twist of the season, you would of not gone much, much earlier. Another problem I have with your game and anyone's game at final tribal council's is taking credit for different moves. Why? Because it takes more than 1 person to agree to a vote and it is most likely that everyone had the same idea as everyone else.
So here are my questions for you:
1. Do you think that relying on a twist is a legit reason to win the game? And why?
2. If the twist wasn't in place, would of you had a different game plan?
3. Finally, if your game was repeated 100 times, do you think you would have the same outcome each time?
Secondly, Econ!
I have to be honest, you played a pretty damn similar game to DBWs, but where less social than him and much more reliant on luck. . It seemed that you where unable to keep an alliance together and immediately fell out of the game (like the rest of out tribe, like it was pretty much Borneo). You weren't voted out at that stage not because of your strategy or strategic pro-ess, you just stayed out of complete luck that they decided to pick someone else first. Another place you relied on luck was at the end of the game when you won immunities. Again, I have confidence in saying that you would of been voted out if you had slipped up in a challenge and would of gone straight home. Also, you can take no credit for the Sarah vote, because it was the most obvious move in history. You would have to be fucking stupid to not see that and it wasn't you just sending a mass email that made everyone notice. No one can take credit for ANY moves this game because they where all straight forward moves. What I'm pretty much basing my vote on is how much your game relied on luck and in your case, a fucking lot. Your a lovely guy and I really do like you, but your game was not particularly special. That said, you can win me over with your answers to the questions!
Questions!!!
1. What part of your game had no luck too it and was completely reliant on your game?
2. If the game changing twist didn't exist, do you think you would of made it this far?
3 Finally, if your game was repeated 100 times, do you think you would have the same outcome each time?
Finally, I move on Huds.
I've got to be honest here, I think you played the best game. You stayed under the rader, was pretty much always on the right side of the numbers and didn't have to rely on immunities. I am highly sure that any way the game went post Sarah's elimination, you would of made it too the end and that is why I'm leaning towards voting for you. Unlike the others, you didn't have to win immunities to win.
Just realised I've got ten mins left to vote because I forgot to finish and post this from like 8 hours a go.
Quick questions for Huds
1. Do you think we should look past the fact that you couldn't win challenges?
2. If your game was repeated 100 times, do you think you would have the same outcome each time?
Good luck guys.