Character-focused edits or Strategy-focused edits?
I noticed in some sites, like Reddit for example, they seem to really favor Character-based edits and I was just curious what the consensus is here?
I personally like the 'Modern-Era' Survivor. Is it flawed? Yes, this most recent season had a very confusing edit and it really sucked because this season had tons of potential. I do think there's been a bit too much of a force on the 'BIGMOVEZ' focus, but dang... Cagayan's a great example of intense strategy and great characters.
I love great characters and I like character-driven seasons a lot. But idk, strategic seasons are really fun IF the edit is clear and it makes sense.
There really have been some amazing seasons here lately and some epic blindsides. Although I do agree that the '#BigMovez' era has taken a bit of the drama/intensity away from blindsides, like in the older seasons a single blindside was huge and shocking, these days it can sometimes feel like it takes a 'historic tribal' to achieve those same feelings like the previous seasons.
I don't know, I can understand the criticisms and I think production needs to kink out their bad editing they've been giving us (aside from Kaoh Rong, that season was very well done)
But at the same time, seasons like Cagayan/MvGX/Cambodia(even though the edit got wonky sometimes) were lots of fun for me.
Okay I'm rambling too much.
What do you guys think? Character-Driven or Strategy-Focused? I really am curious LOL!
I like big characters and big gameplay obviously its rare to have both but when seasons with both do happen i really do enjoy them (cagayan for example)
But I think i'd take characters over gameplay tbh. I watch for entertainment and having boring characters isn't fun to watch, even if they are playing the game hard.
But I think i'd take characters over gameplay tbh. I watch for entertainment and having boring characters isn't fun to watch, even if they are playing the game hard.