5 splozojames50, May 18, 2016
about michelle winning.
how many "bitter juries" have to happen before people realize that survivor is PRIMARILY a social game. there is no official, or even an unspoken rule book that dictates how juries can/should vote. Considering winning the jury vote is literally the ONLY way to win survivor and should be the most IMPORTANT aspect of any one person's game because... that is once again the literal only path to victory, if you piss off the jury members you deserve to lose.
there is literally 0 room for arguing final tribal council losers were robbed because its already proven that they failed at the sole thing you need to accomplish to be able to win.
That's why i didnt say anything about kelley losing last year because at least she didnt get to the point where she would have lost a jury vote. Thinking about it i find it funny because the biggest argument people use to say kelley was robbed was because she would have "won the jury vote!1!" but if she made it to the end and lost to kimmi EVERYONE would be so quick to yap again about bitter juries.
The only times people have been robbed by bitter juries are when they are SUPRISE juries (usually put in place because producers know they will be bitter and for the subsequent drama - Beauty and The Geek, BridalPlasty and ILM come to mind) because then you never knew you were supposed to be keeping up with your #socialgame but if you blatantly ignore that part of the game in survivor you dont deserve to win. simple as that.
#BitterJuriesDontExist #IfYouMakeAJuryBitterItsYourFault
