This site uses cookies. If you continue to browse the site, we shall assume that you accept the use of cookies.

The bluedudeman blog

Posts 87 posts

This makes sense... Feb 27, 2011
http://www.tengaged.com/blog/MikeRORO/1048543/when-are-people

"gunna have some common sense and bet on me =D
look at my damn record i can hold my own =P"

alright so people (including myself) bet on him..

http://www.tengaged.com/bet/26181

he gets 7th. I mail him about it

his response:

From MikeRORO
Re: No title
Feb 26, 2011 23:04:15
to bluedudeman MikeRORO
> lol mhmmmm..im not pist about my betters..about a thousand times i told people not to bet lmao..yet they bet

Mike you're a great guy but this doesn't make sense at all :P
Points: 6 1 comments
Public better finish what they started... Feb 18, 2011
I vote to save Someguy123 every time because I knew him from a group game, and he was one of the nicest people there. That's why I save him.

Anyways...

I think the Public should finish what they started and make sure that Someguy wins. But it's not because he's a noob, or that he's played a terrible game. I don't know the inside of the stars game, I don't know if he's working at all, or busting his ass. But I hope the public votes for him to win...

This is because yeah, maybe the first time or the second, it was okay to have him win an eviction, but now it really is just for the laughs in my opinion, people are getting rid of people who are very deserving and actually fight in the game. I hope this continues though, because they shouldn't just now start keeping the deserving players, that's really just an insult to everyone who was evicted by someguy. They probably just found out that they were up against him, and there was almost no chance.

I'm not putting my thoughts into words very well, but I think we should finish what we started and just give someguy the win and throw this stars out... I just think it will be an insult to all the great players that got evicted by large margins to someguy if we just let him get evicted now. We're basically admitting that the huge amount of public was wrong to save someguy for the laughs, and that NOW the most deserving player should win.
Points: 19 1 comments
Why lie in Castings? Oct 28, 2010
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think in a castings, 5 keys, 100% health, 2347 checks, and a better competition score, would usually beat someone with 1 key, 100% health, and 1899 checks.

http://www.tengaged.com/game/19344 < - - that's the game I'm talking about.

Libertarian clearly stated that he had the better stats (and it was serious, as he said he "lied" before, to avoid getting evicted if nommed) but if he had such better stats than me, (the other stats) why wouldn't he get 2nd over me?

This brings me to my main reason.

What is the point of lying in castings. If you get nommed, you get nommed. In this case, we were in the final day, what's the point of lying about your stats then? There's no jury, or anything, the computer will decide, we don't.

This whole castings was full of lies, and I don't see a reason for it, in such a simple game. You play a game, talk a bit, get collectables, and vote. There's no need for a strategy.
Points: 15 12 comments