Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think in a castings, 5 keys, 100% health, 2347 checks, and a better competition score, would usually beat someone with 1 key, 100% health, and 1899 checks.
Libertarian clearly stated that he had the better stats (and it was serious, as he said he "lied" before, to avoid getting evicted if nommed) but if he had such better stats than me, (the other stats) why wouldn't he get 2nd over me?
This brings me to my main reason.
What is the point of lying in castings. If you get nommed, you get nommed. In this case, we were in the final day, what's the point of lying about your stats then? There's no jury, or anything, the computer will decide, we don't.
This whole castings was full of lies, and I don't see a reason for it, in such a simple game. You play a game, talk a bit, get collectables, and vote. There's no need for a strategy.
Comments
I had 7 keys and someone with like 3 I think, beat me.
Hmm.. I thought though, if you had all 4 things better (and by a lot) then you were a for-sure higher placement then someone with much lower.
I mean, that game, we never saw a key, there were only 4 confirmed, myself with one, but then he came out saying he has 5, and 2,300 checks, when he definitely didn't talk as much as anyone else. It's more about lying though than the stats.
#2. Go to the fourth user who commented on this blog. Their third ever game. The winner of that games, first game. The winner of that game, in their third MOST RECENT game, whoever placed 4th in that game, their 2nd ever blog is clue #3.
Survivor: Lesotho Hidden Immunity Idol Clue -
I have hosted one other survivor season to completion; go to a blog of the runner up of that season to claim a hidden immunity idol.
&ct=s