Now I'm not saying that Sarah48 (or #longliveSarah48) hasn't played a good game, but perhaps one of the funniest jury speeches?
"Tengaged, prove that anyone can win"
Prove that ANYONE can win? I may be taking this the wrong way, but to me that absolutely sounds like she's saying that we should vote her to prove, if she can win, we ALL can.
I like Jenzie, I think she is very entertaining, and gives a lot to her audience, where most players don't really give us a sense of the game, just cliches about how well they're (not) playing.
But I think since the Jenzie blog (and it may have been sooner, but this seemed to have a noticeable effect) there has been a precedent to be extravagant with shit like rap songs and twerking, which in the end did not curry the support the makers thought it would.
It seems anybody with access to a camera or a nice body has a golden ticket to the end, and so I'm asking, what do you think Tengaged? Are these extravagant videos and attempts to win us over great entertainment, or something that is ruining the integrity of the few people that really can play?
I've been getting into keeping up with Stars games recently, because I'm SO PART OF THE COMMUNITY, and sometimes I think, 'wow geez, they're popular,' but with all the popularity comes an equal amount of backlash. Do you have to sign an agreement to be hated when you join Stars, despite if you're actually a good person.
Okay, so it may not be tengaged, but it's close to it!
You may or may not have heard, but Erik Reichenbach, possibly the dumbest Survivor contestant is doing something extremely brilliant, because he is in fact a very smart and talented man. He is developing an app for a very small amount of money, and he needs your help.
And give me a helping hand with anything you have. He's a brilliant artist and has a fantastic developer behind him, and just think how much fun it could be.
Promote this on your blog too if you like it, and thanks a lot. 4 days left!
