Ziggy's Question: Pieguy, I view your game as the most honest and loyal game. We may not have talked much throughout the game, but that's because I knew where your loyalties lied. Everyone knew who you were working with and felt no need to try and sway your vote. At the same time, that meant you were a predictable player and didn't really make any big game moves that impressed me wildly. I find respect in a loyal and honest game, but why is a loyal, yet predictable, style of gameplay more deserving of my vote than the other two finalist's style of gameplay?
My Answer: Thank you for your kind words Ziggy. To begin with, I I believe that out of the 3 Finalists, I am the ONLY one who has not pissed off any of you Jury Members. I feel that while some of us didn't talk much or at all, we still remained on relatively good terms. Personally, I was not aware that every one in the cast knew who I was aligned with and where my loyalties lied. I guess that explains why no one ever wanted to talk to me LOL. To be honest, my vote could have potentially been swayed had people actually approached me, as all of my allies left me on the outs at Tribal Council at one point or another during the early stages of the Merge. As far as big game moves that I made, I would say that blindsiding Wiley by playing my Idol on Joel was my best one. In addition, I think everyone here knows that I tried countless times to blindside Bambino, but for whatever reason people were not interested. I was also open to blindsiding Sparticus potentially for 5th/4th, but Magge was not interested and Bambino never approached me about a vote. Overall, despite being constantly lied to and backstabbed, I was able to play a relatively honest and loyal game, while avoiding being a target until 8th. It may seem predictable to most, but I knew in the latter part of the Merge who was going to vote with me, and who would not. Ultimately, I feel that my game play was stronger than Magge's and Sparticus' for the following reasons:
*Magge played the Middle I believe throughout the entirety of the Merge, basically aligning with close to everyone and flipping on them at one point or another.
*He really was not willing to make any major moves, such as blindsiding Bambino earlier in the Merge or Sparticus later in the Merge.
*I feel like this gameplay could have caused some jury members to be angry with him.
*Sparticus was very aggressive throughout the entirety of the Merge, consistently lying and backstabbing people to try and improve his position.
*Was reliant on his Hidden Immunity Idol, which would have caused him to be voted out over Awwsum11 if he didn't play it.
*His aggressive attitude and gameplay possibly rubbed some jury members the wrong way.
Thus, I believe that I played not only a loyal and honest game, but a solid and consistent one as well. I gave many people an opportunity to work with me, such as Mark, Spencerfan, Awwsum11 (I believe?), Crypt, and you yourself Ziggy. They chose not to work with me, and showed me where you stood, so I was fine with voting any of you out. In conclusion, I feel as though my game play resulted in me not having any blood on my hands, while showing that I did have a strong strategical, social, and physical game.