This site uses cookies. If you continue to browse the site, we shall assume that you accept the use of cookies.
Big Brother and online Hunger games.
zephyr_blue

zephyr_blue's blogBlog

  1. Survivor: San Juan Del Sur
  2. Fasting Strategies
  3. Voting Out Actives Before Inactives...
  4. Come Join Fast Casting #53582
  5. Ever get the feeling someone is straight up BS'ing..
  6. Amazing Race Yesterday...
  7. Canadian? What county are you from?
  8. Favorite Tengager?
  9. Return of Tengaged!
  10. Later Tengaged
  11. Parvati was robbed!!!
  12. First Win!!!! Gaga vs Admiral
  13. Yellow!!!!
  14. First Top 4
  15. KEY KEY KEY
  16. LOST!!!
  17. Montreal vs Pittsburgh 2-0
  18. Survivor Bus Ride
  19. Canadians are gonna win!
  20. New Bloggy Blog
  21. Survivor Bets
  22. Post Your Name
  23. Boost Brain Power by Exercise!
  24. Addiction Activated +++
  25. Day 2 - Good versus Bad
  26. Boiling Hot/Can't Sleep
  27. New to this World

Voting Out Actives Before Inactives...

Feb 10, 2012 by zephyr_blue
Possibly the lamest thing you can do.

I think it shows poor character and actually bad strategy.

Trinket and tabbyness

Simply pathetic.

Comments

it's actually a smart move but you gotta wait ... you'll learn lol
Sent by bellajennaxo,Feb 10, 2012
it is annoying because you have to wait ages. I prefer to get the inactives out first. +15
Sent by HelenCoops,Feb 10, 2012
i fully agree with you here, its the chickens way out if u are to scared to be able to compete with other people..... so u keep the inactives LAME CHICKEN SH!T MOVE
Sent by Sirhc,Feb 10, 2012
I really don't think it's smart. And it isn't classy.

If I had not been taken out of my game they wouldn't have made me angry, I wasn't even trying to win. Instead, they opted to piss someone who they had agreed to align with whereas they still could've won and not pissed anyone off... it's really basic. It's not like we're playing for any money here. Choosing to piss someone you aligned with is a needless action, not a smart one.
Sent by zephyr_blue,Feb 10, 2012
i agree zephyr_blue
Sent by sandizzle,Feb 10, 2012
i think its actually a smart move
Sent by snels66,Feb 10, 2012
I won my last fasting with that strategy kty :*
Sent by LadyPink,Feb 10, 2012
I won my last fasting with that strategy kty :*
Sent by LadyPink,Feb 10, 2012
certainly is a way to win... I don't disagree... my point is that it is a lame way to win.
Sent by zephyr_blue,Feb 10, 2012
especially when you've aligned with the active.
Sent by zephyr_blue,Feb 10, 2012
inactives defo go 1st .. but i think its ok when u discover an alliance to get rid of 1 or 2 of them if u can be4 other inactives .. just to keep their numbers down. Agree?
Sent by paddy_mc_donald,Feb 10, 2012
You left the game! OMG! YOU LEFT US! Innactives came back, and I almost got voted out. Sorry, but our strategy was to vote out innactives...you were innactive!
Sent by Trinket,Feb 10, 2012

Leave a comment

Login to add comments