It's the system for voting people off. Not the algo process for nominations, the voting system the users have created for themselves. The system of voting off the most active, and keeping the least.
Now, maybe I can understand the logic in a sense. If the inactive, no score players are kept until the final 4, you're getting 2nd or 1st guaranteed.
But that is also the issue. Two people, who haven't even played the first game, are going to get more karma and money than about sixteen other players who are actually active and want to play, assuming it's successful. You're rewarding crappy players.
And what if they never play tengaged again? What if they tried it and didn't like it?
Maybe the players in 1st and 2nd don't care, but 5th under SHOULD. That's their karma and T$ they're getting screwed out of, not even going to the cause of a too-busy person. Unfortunately, everybody votes with the attitude that they will be 1st or 2nd.
Agree or disagree?
Comments
Agreed, but that unfortunatly is a player discression thing. There is no real way to fix that.
I hate getting voted out before players who havent even logged in for days simply because of a bad case on DoND that noms me for the first time in a casting and I am out. Seriously makes me consider joining a casting and then walking away for the next couple days and seeing how it plays out for me. Sounds like more karma and T's that way.
I also very much dislike how being active is essential however when you do get nommed you are a much bigger threat if you are active. I try not to talk very much for this reason. I get little to no bonuses in challenges but staying off the radar helps as far as I can see.
