This site uses cookies. If you continue to browse the site, we shall assume that you accept the use of cookies.
Big Brother and online Hunger games.

Another question

Nov 12, 2015 by jonghyun408
Do you think in TERMS OF GAMEPLAY did those threeake the right move? Like for TV, yeah, but do you think they made the right vote?

tbh, Savage.isnt really a strategy threat lol, imo they should have went after Tasha/Jeremy

what do you think?

#survivor

Comments

Yes
Sent by Mchappy,Nov 12, 2015
Yes, Andrew was a threat. They showed they are willing to play. Players on the bottom now have a reason to flip. Joe/Fish could use the three to get each other out. Tasha lost her closest ally so now she has to rethink her game.
Sent by JeffW,Nov 12, 2015
Mchappy idk, like i need to know why they went after Savage and not a strategic.threat (i guess it can be because they thought he was the leadervof the alliance)
Sent by jonghyun408,Nov 12, 2015
Savage was a strategic threat. He was on top calling a lot of shots or suggesting a lot of things.
Sent by JeffW,Nov 12, 2015
JeffW i see, because i am confused why it was him at first lol
Sent by jonghyun408,Nov 12, 2015
And Savage was NEVER going to work with the three. Other people would be willing to.
Sent by JeffW,Nov 12, 2015
JeffW yeah, he is rhw kind of person (he was at PL too) who leads and wants things tp go his way
Sent by jonghyun408,Nov 12, 2015
Savage is a big threat physical wise and social - he has Bayon. He already planted the seeds for Joe to flip (specifically on Stephen). He made it clear he wanted Ciera gone too so he risked their plan. The girls need a "common enemy" and that's in Jeremy/Tasha
Sent by Mchappy,Nov 12, 2015

Leave a comment