As is the case in most reality shows, the winner always seems to have played a noble, morally sound game. But why? It's a game. Why is it that the backstabbing asshole always loses to the kind, generic floater? I seize to have an answer. Why is it a good thing when people say "I played a fair, modest game" and a bad thing when they say "I backstabbed all of you and loved it". Both ways got them to the final, no? Thus, both were effective were they not? Reality show houseguests need to stray away from their friendly efforts to gain popularity within the house and simply do what it takes to reach the final. From there, the jury should vote on who they believed played a "better game", not who played a nicer one.
