But that they don't see Paul winning as being okay. Don't get me wrong, I don't like either of them. They BOTH bullied others and are generally just not good people. However, I can at least say that Paul, other than jury management, played a very good game.
Josh played okay, but in no way was his overall gameplay better than Paul's. I feel like it's a Dan and Ian situation, where the worse player won because the better player had bad jury management. People were not okay with it then, so why do they like it now? At least Ian wasn't insufferable like Josh.
EDIT: Maybe I'm just missing the point and people just hated the season so much that they wanted some irony but idk
Comments
I think more people are happy Paul lost. BB19 will not go down as Josh winning it, it will go down as Paul losing again.
Akora I understand that, but I don't see Josh as being any better than Paul. What I was trying to argue here is that they are BOTH vile, so I would have rather seen the better player win. Thank you for your input though
oh ok I see your point. Yeah true, Paul did play better, but he just flopped at jury management which really is the most important factor for winning @donutdude566
