Without being rude, insulting or threatening.
#JustSaiyan
Let's try this! I will write a point down and try to disagree without making me cry.
Okay, here we go:
"Kill the trees! Who needs oxygen, amiright?"
Now disagree below. :D
0 CheapCheep, Jan 17, 2015
Looks like Ghoku going super saiyan. With brown hair.
Don't ask me how I know what Ghoku's hair looks like.
#JustSaiyan
1 CheapCheep, Aug 29, 2014
People join Stars though. Like unless you win the raffle or the seat, it's the biggest waste of money and a low payout of karma considering you wont win.
Legitimately castings probably have the best payout ratio. #JustSaiyan
1 CheapCheep, Mar 19, 2014
Not mad but #JustSaiyan
who wants these?
Mar 19, 2014 by remote
you have to have hardly any designs
From remote to Typhlosion37, in shop Callum Klein
As Ty had 10 gifts? O.o Just confused but grats Ty lol.
2 CheapCheep, Mar 13, 2014
*I feel like just giving my personal opinion on a bunch of TG stuff today I don't know why*
.
.
.
.
.
I'm sure i'm far from first to bring this up, but frookies payouts need to be changed. When you look at a game like castings, anyone who makes it into the F13 is getting some sort of reward. Whether it's just 2T's or 20T's, you're still getting a reward for joining and lasting that long. I feel castings are rewarding that way, thus why I play castings more often.
With frookies however, the only time you'll profit is if you make the final two. If you make F5, you're only getting back the money you used to pay in order to play. Anything below 5th automatically gives you a net loss of 10T's.
The reward isn't satisfying, neither are the means of getting into the F2. HoH is really just a matter of who can spam the most while getting plussed. POV, or veto, instead involves you to actually compete in a challenge in order to keep yourself safe and/or get you into the F2.
A lot of good players have hit the wall near F6, which I feel isn't fair. I understand there needs to be a cut-off at some point in the game for reward, because not everyone can win. But I feel with not just frookies but other games for that matter, the cut-off is way to far from the beginning.
F5 in frookies is the cut-off in a game of 13. F4 is the cut-off in a game like the Hunger Games, with a whopping 30 people. The difference of risk versus reward makes joining a game like frookies or hunger a waste of time and T's.
The other thing I have trouble understanding is that 5th, 4th, and 3rd place all get the same reward *reward being their money back*. So what's the point in choosing 3rd from 4th? Either way you're still getting the exact same payout, so why bother?
If frookies payouts were more beneficial to the people playing, I feel they'd look similar to this:
13th ~ 0K, 0T
12th ~ 0K, 0T
11th ~ 0K, 0T
10th ~ 0K, 0T
9th ~ 0K, 2T *considering you reached jury*
8th ~ 0K, 2T
7th ~ 2K, 5T
6th ~ 3K, 8T
5th ~ 5K, 10T
4th ~ 6K, 12T
3rd ~ 8K, 14T
2nd ~ 10K, 30T
1st ~ 25K, 60T
With the outline above serving for frookies payouts, you're at least getting a bit of your T's back having made jury. Making the F5 involves all your money back as well as a bit of karma.
Anyway, I just figured i'd bring this up. Whether you support me or not, show me your feedback.
#JustSaiyan
0 CheapCheep, Jan 10, 2014
Having to get up for school at 5:00 or sooner should be illegal in every state.
#JustSaiyan
