repealing roe vs wade when abortion is a human right. You may say that its killing a baby, but who are we to tell others what to do with their bodies.
As a man I can't imagine how any woman feels about this.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a great woman, someone we should all look up to. Her death was tragic.
Before she died, she said that she wanted her replacement to be replaced AFTER the election, but trump didnt decide to respect her dying wishes, thats fucked up.
Who has the audacity to that?
I just dont get how anyone can justify this and we need to change. We need change.
Lmao we don't honor dying wishes in this country, that's not how this works. If Scalia's dying wish was to have 10 more conservative judges be added to the Supreme Court you probably would not support honoring that dying wish.
Also, I think you misunderstand what pro-life people believe. You can't disagree with someone if you don't understand their side of the story. They don't believe abortion is a human right, and their response to "my body, my choice" is that you are not allowed to use your body to hurt someone else or infringe upon their rights. They would say that you should not be allowed to use your body to kill a baby in the same way that I am not allowed to use my fist to punch you. You are allowed to do anything with your body except deprive others of rights.
It's perfectly fine for you to be pro-choice, but please try to understand what the other side believes before you debunk them.
“He didn’t respect her dying wishes”
Lmao WHAT, I must have missed the part in the constitution where that mattered. We don’t change laws because someone on their deathbed wants something. If Trump died in office but had a “dying wish” it would literally just get MOCKED by liberals.
Who has the audacity to do that? Literally the PRESIDENT of the United States does. To do his job. He doesn’t just stop being president months before an election. He wasn’t sworn in for 3.75 years. Everyone is just looking for a reason to not let him pick another SCJ, even by the dumbest of reasons
sam_hamwich what the actual fuck are you on about? Trump shouldn’t be able to just appoint a SCJ while holding the country hostage 😂😂😂 the process of getting a new SCH was rushed so fast, to get this religious cunt bag on the court to start assisting in overturning any equal rights minoritized populations of people have gotten over the past couple of years
I wouldn’t expect a white straight male to see otherwise since you already have everything else spoon fed to you in this pos country.
But go off!
How is it fair to have 6 conservative SCJ and 3 liberal...... none of this is fucking fair and you know it. God you’re a piece of work.
The Supreme Court is SO dumb I agree, I personally think it should be destroyed.
It's not fair at all, and it depends entirely on who happens to die during what administration...
However, idk why we have to take the appointing of a justice slow lmao. He appointed her, and the senate approved her... whether or not you agree with her should not change your opinion on the process in which she was appointed. It seems pretty clear that you don't agree with ACB, and I am inclined to believe that you would not be this upset if RBG was the one appointed so quickly. :)
giovannimaxroma no I’m not okay with the process actually. ACB was appointed within a time span of 2 weeks. She’s been a judge for 3 years. She was not only pushed on us by a bigoted administration, but a lot of processes were bypassed while Trump threatened that there would be no stimulus check unless he was re-elected, and all energy would be given to getting ACB in the SC. Now that she’s in......... Mitch is shutting down any possibility of another stimulus check.
Trumps a tyrant, his administration is horrible, and with RBG passing away; she was replaced with a woman that is the complete opposite of her in every way.
None of this is fair. NONE of it. I am not okay with the country being held hostage so that a terrible excuse for a woman would get placed on the SC.
You are entitled to your opinion king, but I personally don't care about the speed of which the nominee is appointed and confirmed. On the stimulus package situation, this is unrelated but I personally believe that these issues should be handled on a state by state basis. The federal government should not be throwing money at people because there is no way a country of 330 million people all have the same needs. Local governments can much more effectively provide stimulus that best applies to their people.
giovannimaxroma the court is supposed to be balanced politically. 4 republicans, 4 Democrats, and one Third Party. Now we have 5 republicans, 3 democrats, and one "Moderate" who voted no to get this immigrant woman an abortion she CONSTITUTIONALLY had the right to. We need a balance so justice is served.
