is solely a game all about winning competitions… if you think the ONLY thing that matters in Big Brother is how many comp wins a person has, then you clearly have never seen the show.
By this logic, you are concluding that Cody from BB16 should have won over Derrick. You are concluding that Josh from BBCAN 10 should have won over Kevin. You are concluding that Dr. Will should never have won the game (he literally didn’t win anything).
Do you see what I’m getting at? Great big brother players are not considered great because they are comp beasts. They’re considered great because they are strategic and social masterminds. When you think about who should win Big Brother, Strategic and Social game should also come to mind and not just comp wins. If all you think about is comp wins when voting for someone in the final 2, you may be giving the win to the wrong person.
