I'm not currently aware of any of these transgressions, but if you could point them out that would always be helpful.
I do think though, that if we start disqualifying every user from everything that has been slightly problematic in the past. With the way the vast majority of users have conducted themselves over they years we would have very little people left who could do anything, even if they were interested.
I also voted on a majority of applications as blind without seeing names
littlemix but follow up question. If I personally said brosky was a no for this position due to the above. I would also them advocate for anyone who has been banned and broken the TOS of the website, to not be able to host any events themselves.
That may be something you think should happen though. But that would be my next step in fairness and how I view the situation
koolness234
I don't think that people of a "higher" power on tengaged should have these high marks against them personally.
But it's everyone's preference.
If it was a few years ago I would've said that Ween shouldn't even be allowed on the website for all the shit he's done in the past, but he's grown as a person.
Brosky is currently still problematic and I think that's where the issue lies.
I mean no offense LittleMix but if we held everyone accountable for their actions right now the best member of the moderation team wouldn’t be in power, One would still have some “shop thief” stigma from salty peeps from years ago lol. And the other would be Sharapova
LittleMix the reason the moderation team fell apart 5-6 years ago is cause Pinzu showed Kentucky the mod panel which caused a rift between him and JustMe. Which is how we lost all moderation.
