This site uses cookies. If you continue to browse the site, we shall assume that you accept the use of cookies.
Big Brother and online Hunger games.

Terrible Situation!

Aug 31, 2011 by DharmaHelper
Working with an alliance of four. Myself, IMRay (LOOK! SOMEONE BLOGGED ABOUT YOU!) lgt and Caligirl. We do fairly well running the votes, with a snag or two mid-game. Caligirl is blamed for the snags (inconsistant voting, some chatter about our alliance) No big deal, we cut her loose and settle on an alliance of 3, which would make final 3 easier anyway.

More badassness, controlling the votes, pulling strings, etc. And eventually we hit final 5. I get the veto, so I'm stoked, but we need one of us to grab it next round or we're doomed. Vote comes in, another win for us, but the veto gets awarded to the person we planned on cutting loose, Alyssa. So there goes Final 3... But I've got the choice to either lgt or Ray. It sucks, because they're both good aliance members, they've both done well with vetos, and I hate having to get rid of someone on my team, always. Ultimately I went with evicting Ray, only because lgt and I were the first people in our alliance.

Would you have done any different? Should I have shut up during the F5 veto and tried for F4?

(This was all in fastings. Which does not make it any less of an interesting game or situation. I just thought since "OMG ITS FASTINGS" keeps coming up, I'd clear the air.)

Comments

Dude its a fastings, start joining slow castings so you can get karma and money and move up on the website. Otherwise ur wasting your time. Fastings are supposed to get you use to plotting and strategizing on this site. From the text above that I barely skimmed what you said and form the looks of it you look like you got it down.....MOVE ON
Sent by Waterprince,Aug 31, 2011
Meh. Fastings is easier on my schedule and a bit funner.
Sent by DharmaHelper,Aug 31, 2011

Leave a comment