That I hate Big Brother fans who idolize Dr. Will, Dan, Derrick, Andy, and Tyler for their incredible social and strategic abilities, and then start talking about how important comps are and start bashing the "floater" strategy the second they start winning some.
Tyler, Will, Dan in 14, Derrick, and Andy all won less comps and were much bigger "floaters" than the people they were sitting next to in the final 2. Therefore by that logic, Kaycee and Ian rightfully won, and Ginamarie, Cody, and Nicole were all robbed.
This way of analyzing Big Brother tells you that Dr. Will is one of the worst winners ever as he was a floater and terrible at comps. The thing is that I know that most people on this site are Big Brother superfans who don't believe in this very simplistic modern Big Brother view of the game, yet everyone who gets to the final 2 of Frooks touts their comp prowess and claims their opponent did nothing.
So I don't know if the people on this site just lie to the jury in the end to win, or if they are so narcissistic that they truly believe that however they played the game was the "right way to play the game."