This site uses cookies. If you continue to browse the site, we shall assume that you accept the use of cookies.
Back to Group

Moderators and players shouldn't be able to influence one another.

Open Poll. Anybody can vote

#1

40.2%
Strongly Agree

#2

13.7%
Agree

#3

7.8%
Slightly Agree

#4

13.7%
Neither Agree nor Disagree

#5

8.8%
Slightly Disagree

#6

5.9%
Disagree

#7

9.8%
Strongly Disagree

Comments

  1. CheapCheep#1 - 41 votes. #2 - 14 votes. #3 - 8 votes. $4 - 14 votes. #5 - 9 votes. #6 - 6 votes. #7 - 10 votes.
  2. SpiderBoomBy influence, I'm assuming you mean ppl not running to their friends to get a desired outcome.
  3. Rperduex11I neither agree nor disagree solely because influence is too vague of a word. Absolutely no influence would mean that players shouldn’t report things, and quite frankly they should. The flip side leads to biased decision making. There has to be a balance on this one.
  4. YuNoLOVEMERandomised should take full responsibility as owner and Creater of tengaged instead of his MIA (retarded)
  5. Novamax2434. There definitely needs to be a balance found in this regard. While a disconnect between moderation and the players can cause a lot of problems, the more integrated the two become the more biased the moderation will be toward people who they are close to. We all know how that turns out when that occurs.
  6. AkeriaAre you serious? #1.
  7. greyconverse#3 we can’t just attack anyone attempting it. Progress is progress. To much influence doesn’t get us anywhere. Tg rarely agrees or is gracious of those trying. We need action
  8. livnglavidaloca7. I think that as a moderator, you need to be here to listen to the other users feedback and take into careful consideration what is going on. If a user feels that there is bullying going on, then moderation should investigate to see if it is true accusations. Then moderation should let games go smooth and orderly, unless there are instances that require a step in, such as pornography or homophobic statements just to name a few.
  9. scooby0000Agree
  10. adeleadele3: Slightly agree. I think mods should have the final say of course, and i would more so trust the moderator than a random person just trying to get their bestie unbanned. Mods do fuck up though, i got banned for actually no reason, when i sent in a report they thought i was the one doing it and not the one i was accusing. So like some mods can be stupid and just fuck up from time to time, so players could speak up in those circumstances
  11. Birks44445
  12. peace123I just put 4 cuz there r so many different ways to go about this. Generally I believe mods shouldn't interfere with gameplay unless its a game coordinator like Jubbzy was (iirc). However player feedback should be taken into account with bans, for example when mods listened to players about unperming me and also when skype video proof of pedophilia was enough to get people banned. However I felt like more and more bans were beginning to be overturned/ignored as time went on, but there is no way for that kind of bias to be completely eliminated :/ soo idk.
  13. iYBF#7. Especially when the moderators are essentially just users themselves, users and moderators should have a relationship where feedback is taken seriously as the users are really the people who keep this site going.
  14. MunchiesI think rules of conduct need to be reviewed asap with players feedback, but moderators gotta learn the rules and apply them according to common sense. reasonableness, that players shouldn't be able to influence. So I slightly disagree with the affirmation.
  15. CheapCheepShould moderation take user feedback seriously? Or should the two function completely separate from one another? Make sure to leave your feedback below!