This site uses cookies. If you continue to browse the site, we shall assume that you accept the use of cookies.
Big Brother and online Hunger games.

Admin listens to the public

3rdFeb 22, 2019 by zakisaboss
and admits when he makes a mistake. I don't remember any other mods that did that tbh. He may be a little quick to ban but also quick to correct his errors.

Comments

The Public isn't always right y'know.
Sent by CiTy,Feb 22, 2019
Agreed
Sent by damo1990,Feb 22, 2019
ooo tea it is frustrating when they make obvious mistakes about stuff but this admin has shown that they will listen and correct stuff when they are wrong which i think is good for hte site overall

our last mods never did that looks at johneh
Sent by koolness234,Feb 22, 2019
admin lets the public control him. same thing happened that night where tyler apparently sent or posted a bannable link. admin didnt even look into it and just banned tyler because half the site told him to then after looking into it he unbanned tyler
Sent by EliOrtiz1234,Feb 22, 2019
I disagree. There was no reason to unban them. It was an effort to appease the public, which the admin isn't required to do. The rule was that if someone was doxing on tengaged, which happened, then the users would be perm banned. That's what happened. The fact that there was skype evidence given in relation to the manner does not mean that it was the evidence used to come to the conclusion of banning the users. After all, all it takes for them to have gotten banned were blogs with a phone number that they weren't supposed to give out. In that case, the skype evidence simply acts as supplementary in proving that there was malicious intent (which there doesn't have to be, the rule is no doxing on tengaged - and that's the rule broken, nothing to do with skype).

Was a permanent ban warranted? Not sure, but that was the rule, and if what admin says is true that the doxing was on tengaged, then the right decision was made to begin with, and the users shouldn't have been unbanned. This was an appeal to the masses.

In other words, "mob rule."
Sent by KrisStory,Feb 23, 2019
APPLEs
Sent by ak73,Feb 23, 2019
lmao yeah johneh was too focused on his fucked up obsession with drag
Sent by rowjone,Feb 23, 2019
KrisStory we did nothing wrong tho sis but good essay a solid C+
Sent by peace123,Feb 23, 2019
that's when he fucks up. the dumb kid cant even do his job right and depends on other people to do it. and he stay fucking up. PERIOD
Sent by Babeeeidah,Feb 23, 2019
krisstory if you look at the evidence there was no doxxing at all by either of the people that were permed. Admin posted this himself so it was not a justified ban in any way
Sent by JustMe,Feb 23, 2019
peace123 you know I have no problem w you, and if there was no doxing, then it’s a good thing you’re back!! Entirely speculation and my .02. No need for you to act condescending in the face of an opposing opinion!

justme my statement assumes that there was doxing on Tengaged. If there wasn’t actual proof from Tengaged, then of course they shouldn’t have been banned. But if there were, then the ban had no reason to be removed.
Sent by KrisStory,Feb 23, 2019
Also zakisaboss most of the past mods didn’t make snap decisions, they discussed perm bans with each other and decided together, most of which were justified and for the most part the “public” agreed with perms. This mod makes a lot of snap decisions without making sure they have the right evidence then have to go back and fix their errors. NoelSarah was the best mod this site ever seen don’t try to make this mod out to be good when they need to learn to stop making all these snap decisions, I think a tengaged court would help stop a lot of these errors with this one.
Sent by JustMe,Feb 23, 2019
krisstory there wasn’t it was literally blogs about a pretzel place
Sent by JustMe,Feb 23, 2019
justme well in that case, my post is purely hypothetical!
Sent by KrisStory,Feb 23, 2019
krisstory I 100% agree that doxxing should justify a perm but in this case there was no doxxing. Even harassment would be a reach.
Sent by JustMe,Feb 23, 2019
justme I like how willing he is to admit his mistakes but he literally does have a quick trigger when it comes to banning people and I even said that in the blog :P
Sent by zakisaboss,Feb 23, 2019
justme please admit your aunt is part of the problem.
Sent by Scononduders,Feb 23, 2019
JustMe There is an issue, but I have suggested alternative routes for the user to take. There was no "snap decision" because, for a long time, the ban was "Under investigation" which simply implies that we are investigating their situation. Usually, it will be altered or removed, depending on the situation. In that time, we had gone over a lot of the information and believed there was an issue. Of all people, you would understand how the public is when friends are banned.

Something I don't get about the public, but in a way see from their perspective about how some situations require almost no evidence, such as for that of .br users/multis, just because they join a Survivor game, that is enough proof to permanently ban them (which I have gotten crap for not). Then there are users multis which I ban based on evidence and have their friends go insane asking for proof. There is a bias in all of us, and I can admit as a human, we will make mistakes.
Sent by Kandee_,Feb 23, 2019
Yeah but they also knew there was no hard evidence that I did anything and permed me anyways which is why they didn’t want to release the proof. They knew full well there was nothing on me. Had no one said anything, I would still be perm banned rn
Sent by Fetish,Feb 23, 2019
kandee_ I do understand how the public is, however if this was an actual case of doxxing the users would still be banned. your initial blog never mentioned “under investigation” it just said they were permanently banned for doxxing when none of the “evidence” you claimed to have showed doxxing in any form by either of the users. This was, no matter how you explain it, a case of a snap decision made over emotions in the moment, I feel like you need to reconsider permanent bans for anything other than pornography, cheating, illegal activities before you issue them, maybe take time to discuss with your mod group and everyone share their view about the situation and if you feel there’s immediate action to be taken, blacklist or temp ban while the investigation is ongoing, permanent is too harsh over this type of thing especially with such little evidence.
Sent by JustMe,Feb 23, 2019
Also kandee_ you should never ban someone because they’re better at games or they have more experience ie people from .br so I agree with you. The public would have everyone besides their friends banned if they could but that’s a completely different situation and shouldn’t even be entertained.
Sent by JustMe,Feb 23, 2019
1 last thing kandee_ I’m not saying I know better or I’m smarter, I just think that perm bans need to be reconsidered and only issued for extreme cases. That was the part that really bothered me about this whole situation. If you felt action needed taken then by all means take action, but does the evidence really warrant a permanent ban for these accounts? That should always be something you think about, people work very hard for the levels they reach and if it’s questionable at all to you then you should never go immediately to a permanent ban
Sent by JustMe,Feb 23, 2019
stop deleting my comments you fucking bitch
Sent by ak73,Feb 23, 2019

Leave a comment