1. you're there for your friend.
2. so that means you're there to help them get 1st place.
3. your to ask them who to nom and who two save.
4. you are not there to get the best placing .
5. the charity holder decides what place you get .
So this is just my opinion on how a charity game should go. I know a lot of people join charity games to help their friends out but toward the end certain people want to get the best place there is so they go against the charity holders wish and that is not right i think it should be all up to the charity holder to decide who get what placing.. I know the charity holder has some very good friends who he or she is tight with and want them to get 2nd and 3rd place so it is not fair to them when someone decided to get them out so they can have the 3rd or 2nd place .. That IS NOT RIGHT TO DO ..
Comments
Yeah and they shouldnt be bitter toward the charity holder
See im one that dont like to tell ppl who to nom unless i know someoen is there to ruin and feel that its fair that everyone has a chance at a good placing but in saying this if i got hoh then i would nom the ppl that im not as close to but thats my opinion
I can not tell people what to do because if I tell them to nom a certain, then the other one will rage at me if he knows that I told the HOH to nom him. I am looking at you unkown
I don't agree at all... You are there for the charity holder only, not the others... The charity holder should not dictate what placing who gets, they ALL JOINED FOR YOU!! To decide that someone should get 13th when they joined to help you is bull... I don't care who disagrees with what I'm saying right now... Fact is fact, they don't join to give your closer friends the better placements... Only to give you the win!
I have to agree with Jenna too :/ In the charities I have, I let things go as they may because in the end, everyone joined for me and I should not be the one to say who should get 13th and who gets a free ride to the end with me.
I think I will have a different opinion on this. I play the game with as much fun as I can even if that involves being competitive. But I always make sure that the charity holder wins the game. I have played like 40+ charity crookies for loads of friends.
in my defence I would say sometime the charity holder dosent even know how the charity works, in that case I gather my friends and take over and make sure that person gets it.
Other times charity holder is too nice or too busy to dictate every move. in that case rules are already defined. Day 5 plus charity holder only, day 6 neg everyone and plus charity holder.
I agree with emo_angel's opinion as long as the person the charity is for wins. Most people prefer their friends to go with them to the end to make sure they get there. If only your friends join, then that may be different.
I don't even like doing charities and I've never done one for myself.. I mean it's one thing to play with your friends.. but it's another to just have everyone give you the win.. I just don't see the point.. I mean I would rather earn my wins.. than be given them..
