its kinda interesting
3rdSep 14, 2020
- to compare and contrast how "BIG MOVES" are praised/valued/actually rewarded on survivor and big brother nowadays. both shows highly overvalue big moves and having some kind of "resume" yet time and again social bonds rule supreme yet nobody wants to say so and will label juries as bitter as a coverup before admitting it. (with the producers having a vested interest in doing so in order to have more exciting tv)
yet with big brother recently its weird because i feel like they want to have their cake and eat it too. ppl will yap and yap over bitter juries and big moves yet every (recent-ish) season all we get are these big mob alliances where the pecking order hardly ever gets strayed from and the biggest question is who will be the person to win hoh and do what everyone wants.
the bb producers are fine with this because it makes the show easier to edit (i think a producer on 18 posted online that they HATED 18 because it actually had power shifts and was hard to edit) so they will turn a non-move into some tv digestible storyline where they just gather a couple hours of footage in one day to get the tv storyline ready and then when they snap their fingers and the game is back on track ie the tyler situation last week
makes you wonder if survivor is as fake as current bb season (or at least if certain moments were manipulated more than we think)
idk im rambling idk if this is coherent or not (its just another excuse to trash bb obviously) but imma post the blog n e ways
Leave a comment