This site uses cookies. If you continue to browse the site, we shall assume that you accept the use of cookies.
Big Brother and online Hunger games.

not to be radical

Feb 28, 2021 by peterya
but i really do think limiting the sexual content is a lot better than raising the age minimum, like for starters, there's users on here that are between the old age minimum and proposed new ones and I don't think its justifiable to ban users who were legal when their account was made and then became illegal.
On top of that, the site is a game that is in no way inherently bad. Big brother & Survivor have no built in sexual aspect, and therefore the sexual sides of this site are entirely user generated. Why not just work to police activity that's damaging to the community?

Also, as someone who is old enough to legally be involved in sexual content, I still dont want to see it like...there are plenty of people here that are 18+ who still don't want to see horn knee blogs page on the daily

Comments

i mean personally i would implement both if it was my choice

if we hypothetically raised the drinking age to 25, would 23 year olds be allowed into bars legally because it was legal before? laws change and it wouldn't be punishing them for being underage before the law was in place, it would be the fact that the law is different now and we go by those set of rules
Sent by Galaxies,Feb 28, 2021
galaxies i mean, I know for many parts of the US when drinking age went up, yes people who were the old drinking age could lmao, I suppose I'd support strict enforcement of 16, even 18, if it 1) grandfathered people already here in
2) also came with the stipulation that sexual content would still be moderated

Im worried that if we say "18+ because sexual content" all that does is punish victims and minors as well as give everyone else free reign to turn blogs page into a horn dog fest
Sent by peterya,Feb 28, 2021

Leave a comment