Big Brother and online Hunger games.
obey_me

obey_me's blogBlog

  1. Australian Survivor Started Tonight
  2. 50.2%
  3. 50.2%
  4. NO WONDER I DON'T PLAY THIS SILLY SITE ANYMORE
  5. 13 Reasons Why 3rd Season
  6. Americans and others that watch survivor please
  7. 13 Reasons Why Returns
  8. Chava
  9. GAGALUV
  10. Didn't know Matt :(
  11. THIS SITE HAS LOST IT'S SHIT
  12. GAGALUV AND JUSTME
  13. so apparently I'm a mod
  14. Randomize
  15. ramdomize please get off
  16. is insanity Ametrine?
  17. Vote Bryce out of stars
  18. so 5 Ametrine multis are negging me
  19. Ametrine has everyone but 3-4 people in this..
  20. could someone tell me how many accounts
  21. Muds survivor Group Game
  22. Maybelline
  23. Tarag
  24. Tarag
  25. TARAG HAS BULLIED PAGE54 & JACKEDGE
  26. JackEdge your Charity
  27. Blank
  28. Blank
  29. Blank
  30. Blank
  31. Blank
  32. BLANK
  33. Blank
  34. Blank
  35. Blank
  36. BLANK
  37. Blank
  38. HAPPY BIRTHDAY JACKEDGE MY FRIEND
  39. Blank
  40. Blank

Americans and others that watch survivor please

May 24, 2018 by obey_me
has the ruling always been if it's a tie that the 3rd finalist cast the winning vote? I'm sort of happy Wendall won but survivor I feel is going backwards. Are there written rules? Or just make as we go. Anyone? Australian here. Just watched the finale. #gobacktoafinaltwo

Comments

He said it before at the Game Changers reunion.
Sent by SurvivorFreak13,May 24, 2018
I’m pretty sure it has always been a rule but Jeff just revealed last year.
Sent by HUNTERBC88,May 24, 2018
survivorfreak13 & Hunterbc88 so Jeff stated if it was a tie the 3rd person would decide? It resonates a little but I feel is a bad choice. Jury should be uneven.
Sent by obey_me,May 24, 2018
That’s why there only needs to be a final 2 and not a final 3.
Sent by HUNTERBC88,May 24, 2018
obey_me see if it was a 9 person jury it could tie 3-3-3 and then they would be reli fucked
Sent by Eoin,May 24, 2018

Leave a comment