Nmh95 I have never once tried to deny the fact people voted for me to win Stars in 2016. Yet when we have discussion about cheating in 2020 people try to bring what happened with me winning stars to discredit my opinion and to rationalize their cheating. You did it not one month ago when you cheated and I asked you why you cheated and you once again use that old tired logic about you had people voted you to win in stars. Does that mean I cannot speak up about cheating nowadays. Because when I do you and others always use that rhetoric. I have admitted my faults and have never once tried to hide the fact about what happened in 2016. However, you and others use it as constant validation to not only silence my critiques about you and others cheating in 2020 but also try to invalidate my opinion on the matter. What you are doing is a scholarly defined logical fallacy essentially saying someone who smokes cigarettes in 2016 but has quit has no right telling someone who smokes in 2020 not to quit because of their past actions.
Comments
"Calling people hypocrites does not make you any less of a cheater.
And tbh I don't remember details of our conversation bc of how lengthy it was. But you never asked, nor cared why I cheated. You simply called it cheating. So please don't act like you cared about my side of the story. I felt validated BECAUSE I was going against 10 people who were doing everything in their power to prevent someone like me who had no cheated prior to that moment from winning.
nmh95 The statement was that they are hypocrites and her opinion was that they are hypocrites.
1. Thus me saying she is no better than them, does not discredit her opinion because her opinion was that they are hypocrites. Had I argues well you have no right to call them hypocrites at all and they are not hypocrites is discrediting her opinion. Telling her that she is "just as bad as they are" does not make any argument to say the people she is calling out are not hypocrites. Just that she is no better than them. They may be hypocrites and cheated first but that does not make her any less of a cheater. Which by your argument with me in stars 2016 is the same following logic.
2. I did ask why you cheated and you cannot assume I never cared, because you cannot operate in my mindset nor make any legitimate statement about what I care or do not care about. You told me the same reason you stated above. I asked you well if everyone follows that logic than we can all be justified to cheat. In my first stars win with multis I was told even after going unnommed that certain individuals promised me I would not win and would vote on multis. Essentially the same logic you used. Which at the time I used it as a logical rationalization for my unjust gameplay. However, I learned that two wrong do not make a right and in your case 11 wrongs do not make a right. However, you did not want to hear that logic.
shellbelle You are just as bad as they are."
Are you not.... discrediting her opinion.? LOL
And tbh I don't remember details of our conversation bc of how lengthy it was. But you never asked, nor cared why I cheated. You simply called it cheating. So please don't act like you cared about my side of the story. I felt validated BECAUSE I was going against 10 people who were doing everything in their power to prevent someone like me who had no cheated prior to that moment from winning.