This site uses cookies. If you continue to browse the site, we shall assume that you accept the use of cookies.
Big Brother and online Hunger games.

WAW

Apr 10, 2021 by bayonetta
If not for fire twist, Sarah (or Natalie) probably wins. Cause they vote out Tony at 4th.

If not for fire and eoe, Denise (or Sarah) probably wins. Michelle and Tony get voted out. Even Ben has a shot depending on Final Council.

Comments

And both were known twists anyways going into the season, so to say they would’ve been avoided is kind of a stretch
Sent by MrBird,Apr 10, 2021
Sarah said she wouldn't have voted Tony out, and vice versa.
He probably would be making fire against Michelle
Sent by Electric,Apr 10, 2021
electric Umm maybe she said that to seem a good friend, but there is no way I believe Sarah would sacrifice 2 easy million dollars just to be a buddy of Tony. She would have voted him out and snatched the money so fast...
Sent by bayonetta,Apr 10, 2021
bayonetta She was setting up her final 3 jury speech against Tony from final 6 on. Her jury speech was going to be about the bias of her game vs Tony's game, and how Tony is seen as a bigger player than her. If she was setting that up, why on Earth would she vote him out for 4th anyway?
She was okay with a final 3 because she thought the votes would split and she could possibly win a plurality vote.
Sent by Electric,Apr 10, 2021
electric But Natalie from EoE knows that the biggest jury threat is Tony, and she probably tells her to get him voted out. I dont think she is that dumb to pull a Woo, Idk. Maybe she said that she was gonna do that to expose the bias, but again, in the end I dont think she would sacrifice 2 easy millions. Or maybe she is dumb and knowing fully that the same bias that she was trying to fight probably makes him winner, takes him to finals with her and then...he wins cause duh the bias.
Sent by bayonetta,Apr 10, 2021
bayonetta We know Natalie tells them the biggest jury threat is Tony, that's not the issue.
She wouldn't have pulled a Woo because Cagayan was a final 2, not a final 3. Sarah has an amazing social game and has people on the jury like Ben, Kim, Sophie, etc who would've voted for her 100%. With the 3 votes going towards Natalie already, and Sarah's gender bias argument she started 3 tribals earlier to have it settle on the jury's heads, she would've taken that risk.
She said she knew if she was in a final 2 with Tony she'd lose, but a final 3 and her amazing social game, she easily could squeak out two more votes for a plurality win.
Sent by Electric,Apr 10, 2021
electric No, the girls on the jury actually hated her and even Kim and Sophie said nasty things about her, cause she was so fake and manipulative to them. Thats why Sarah was pissed that she was being hated and Tony praised and said that there was a bias.

In a f4 of Sarah, Tony, Michelle and Natalie with no fire twist, yes, she pulls a Woo (taking the biggest threat to the final, and in this case, Tony again lmao) if she votes to keep him and not to vote him out.

And again, if there is a bias, the dumb thing is not eliminate it completely voting the person that comes along with it and instead taking him with you. If you know that someone is extremely liked when put at your side, maybe its unfair and you want to fight that injustice, but the smart move is not to fight the bias cause it is probably gonna exist still (cause you know, sometime lifes not fair) but instead eliminating that person lmao.

Idk maybe you are right and she was dumb enough to take a person that a jury had a huge bias for, but I find that extremely silly and not a thing she would do.
Sent by bayonetta,Apr 10, 2021

Leave a comment