A) the Tony/Wendell/Dom/Ben who relied on idols to have the confidence to be dominant
or
B) the Sarah/Natalie A. who made 1 move because of a twist to wow the jury
or
C) the Tyson/Cochran/Kim/Jeremy who relied on having a dominant alliance throughout the game
or
D) the Denise/Sandra (HvV)/Earl/Michelle who relied on how they managed to get to final 3 despite not making flashy moves #Survivor
idk a lot of these classifications are based purely on game moves and not necessarily how they formed social bonds with the jury (which would be the strengths of category D whereas you described them as more lacking)
idk a lot of these classifications are based purely on game moves and not necessarily how they formed social bonds with the jury (which would be the strengths of category D whereas you described them as more lacking)
splozojames50lemjam6
Yeah true, I just want to see where TG lies based on which end game they seem to value more
Obv each strategy helps hence why they won their season respectively. Since it seems nearly impossible for a scenario where a f3 has Player A/B/C/D in the finals. Like if a Ben, Denise, Cochran, Natalie A. made finals 3
