This site uses cookies. If you continue to browse the site, we shall assume that you accept the use of cookies.
Big Brother and online Hunger games.

Paul is a self-entitled little bitch.

Sep 21, 2017 by Simplyobsessed
He just expected everyone to put his interests ahead of their own game. and if they did anything to help themselves he turned the house against them. got angry with them and bullied them. If that was just a strategy it would be understandable, but you could tell from his body language and his DRs that he was actually furious and doing it to punish them. That's what sets him apart from others who have dominated the game (Derrick, Dan ect) - yes they got people out, and yes they were ruthless. But when it came down to it they treated people with a basic level of respect and were capable of separating personal feelings and the game.

He seems the kind of guy who got everything he wanted as a child, and didn't know the value of any of it. Paul grew a beard, got piercings and tattoos but I really think that's just an image, he probably decided to do that one day because he thought he was being rebellious. He's spoiled, self entitled.

Going into the final 2 he expected to win, he thought that he could treat the jury like shit and still get their votes? That may work on people like Raven (woof woof) but Cody, Mark and Elena weren't gonna have it. Any half decent player should realise that people sat in the jury house with nothing to do are going to compare notes, and Jason even told him in his question that they have done so. But he continued to lie, and the whole jury knew he was lying. What the fuck was that?

Paul just isn't as smart as he thinks he is, he was a returning player in a cast of people where most of them were sub-par players. Big Brother is a numbers game, and if the majority are sheep then of course the experienced player is going to use them to get rid of anyone with a working brain. I mean, some of these people didn't even know what a Veto was. The returning player, especially one who had played very recently and made it far, has a clear advantage. They know how the game works, how production works, Paul got safety for the first 4 evictions and when someone wants to know any information about how stuff works they of course are going to go to Paul. His claim that he was at a disadvantage going in was bullshit - the odds were stacked to favour him from Day 1.

I feel like the more likely a juror was to vote Paul the less respect they have for themselves.

Comments

PAUL GOT ROBBED
Sent by vannynessa19,Sep 21, 2017

Leave a comment