Dixie: Why keep doing Survivor with passed players?once in 10 years is too many as far as I’m concerned. How many times do we have to watch Rob and Sandra
Doreen Talma: I don’t feel that past winners should be allowed to win again, they’ve had their chance! If you have to run past players again why not include Ozzie, who was one of the best players ever.
Bob Alan: Totally agree.
Are the producers of “Survivor” so lazy they don’t want to conduct a new search with new and interesting players?
I’m tired of the same players getting another chance.
Barb: It would be interesting to have a Survivor Season without lies. I not knocking the Survivor premise of outplay, outwit, outlast but a change up would be pretty cool to see who would win without a lie. If someone lies they are ether penalized or evicted. Just a thought.
Becky: If you need to include past winners, find a different way to do it. Players should be those who have never played before.
Kukakutacncy: Boring concept. The richer gets richer, the American monopolizing concept. (Look at Starbucks and others sprouting like mad at every corner of the block!!!).
Such a big country but not able to come up with a better concept. Sad.
Cindy: Enough of bringing people back
JESUS PEOPLE
Comments
We have seen enough of Ozzie, Coach, Russel, etc. I think we need another second chance. Many people have had like 3-4 chances....
I think an all winners season is good, as long as it doesn’t become a trend. We need opportunity for seasons with no returning players, and seasons with players who haven’t played over 2 times.
Reason why their all like this
All of these people just really wanna be in a survivor season but know they will never be in one so their salty about it.
I think an all winners season is good, as long as it doesn’t become a trend. We need opportunity for seasons with no returning players, and seasons with players who haven’t played over 2 times.