Whether or not the perm ban is the reasonable punishment, it isn’t like it was a spur of the moment decision to perm ban the individuals involved. Admin literally posted a blog stating that doxing would result in perm bans.
I mean they could’ve just not posted personal info which is unbelievably easy to avoid doing. It just requires a level of maturity that exceeds that of a 14 year old.
No offense to those accused, I don’t have problems w you, but I mean you can’t bitch about the consequences when they were explicitly given just a little while back.
Comments
The issue is with Skype. They aren't a Skype moderator. They could block the person if they really want to
damo1990 and paige54 admin also says in the blog that it was posted on Tengaged as well, which is what warranted the ban. If admin is lying about it being posted, then clearly the shouldn’t be banned. But assuming the facts are true, they posted on Tengaged, they deserved the ban. The blog only talks about skype in an attempt to explain the situation. It’s aftually besides the point and seems more than anything to be an attempt to be totally transparent about the situation. Either way, if the rule is a perm ban for posting on Tengaged, and that’s what they did, then the ban was warranted. If not, then that’s another story. Again, just going off of what I’m seeing.
