-everyone votes publicly for a nomset ( possibly to an outside host or In a group game ). whoever has the highest votes The HOH noms.
-The NomSet is then Blogged and the public votes until DC is in the last minute. Whoever has the most votes The cast votes out
-NO POVs are Played
-Final 2 ( or 5? )gets blogged out and Public votes on the winner. (timed poll ) then jury votes that person the winner...
What do you think and any Ideas to add?
Important Comments
RaverKid
Tbh there's so many flaws to this. If multiple people say the same nomset, everyone knows who the alliances are. When in stars nobody knows who votes for who. You're basically saying fastings should get a jury. Lol.
-Yes but you must take that into consideration.
The only stop to that would have everyone in the game join a group to have real polls
Sparkinator
Someone automatically wins POV though so what would happen with that
-Hmm Yes, I didnt think of that. That would need a work around
Also would people be online after an hour or two to wait to vote if they're jury?
-we would hope that at least 4 people would be there to vote whoever the public wants to win
Also how long would people have to blog? How would voting work it's confusing since voting isn't public
-I would imagine untill DC is around the last 30 seconds or so
Tbh there's so many flaws to this. If multiple people say the same nomset, everyone knows who the alliances are. When in stars nobody knows who votes for who. You're basically saying fastings should get a jury. Lol.
This Frooks will follow the format of Stars with a few variations. On Day 1, HoH must NOT nominate until told to do so. All players will mail Johneh (I'm guessing you'd like to host it right?) two people they'd like to see nominated. The two with the most votes will be nominated. The HoH gets double nomination powers, meaning the two people he/she nominates will get two points from them (i.e. if he nominates me and you, we'd both get two points as opposed to the normal 1 point). If there is a tie, it will be broken by random.org. Then, the Tengaged public will have five minutes to evict one of the nominees, and in the last two minutes the voters will lock in their votes. When someone wins POV, it is their choice whether to use it or not. If it is used, the person with the next highest number of votes will be nominated. At final four, third and fourth place will be voted on by the public. If someone wins both HoH and POV, the public will vote on who gets final two and who gets third and fourth place. Then, the public will vote on a winner and the jury must lock in their votes for that person.
**This is what I sent him a couple of months ago, still looking for why he said it wouldn't work.
i don't think this is an awful idea I just think the problem with public voting is that there's going to be a mob mentality. someone's going to throw out a nomset in public chat and everyone's going to hop on board because then they won't be the only one that did it
realityobsessed I go with what iangavin says because it makes it more complicated. Breaking a tie with random.org is kinda stupid because we will never really know what will happen and it can be easily manipulated. But everything is else is much perfect than HUmanMustard's idea.
