Amf7410 got banned for posting asterisks together to censor out a bad word that someone else said in a skype convo and then got banned during Christmas stars, which he joins every year.
On Admin’s profile it says that “You don't have to type out the full word for it to be banworthy. If your intent is obvious.”
Um the intent was to post a conversation about stars and remove the bannable word that someone else said. And not only that he got banned DAYS after he blogged it. I’m bald
Comments
So please Admin unban amf7410 he is a kind sweet soul and I’ve never seen him do anything wrong or ever have purposeful malicious intent!
No, that is incorrect. They were banned for using homophobic language without censoring. The entire word was used, no asterisks included. I see the blog you were referring to, but this was a completely different situation.
ElectraViv Let me add, I just realized it was the same blog, BUT, there were asterisks edited following the post of the blog. We received a report; it does apply. They are accountable for what they post to the site...
3. Posting of Skype conversations (or other quotes) -
If you blog or post a copy of a Skype conversation (or other quotes from another user) in a game, YOU are responsible for what you post on Tengaged, not the person who originally said it.
I saw the original blog, it def had the entire bannable word, and i commented "why are you trying to ban yourself?", then he edited it with the asterisks. I think it was a genuine mistake on his part, but yeah. Sadly someone took a screenshot of the original lmao.
AdminKandee_
Question - In the scenario where someone wants to blog calling out Tengaged-bannable language used outside of Tengaged where it is not bannable (but possibly criminal depending on the context), how can one do it? 🤔
Would this work: " Jesus said [insert bannable word here]!"
Explained on Admin's profile...
"If the censored word is said in a non-derogatory manner, we will allow. If used to express how the word is utilised rather than using it against another user."
There are a range of examples under rule 1 (offensive language), so if anyone is ever confused, it should clear things up!
By the very definition you posted it tells you in plan language if you use a bannable word even if you use * etc to replace part of it you can still be banned...Furthermore he has been around long enough to know repeating what someone else said is still bannable so only has himself to blame in that instance I'm afraid...