"I told people on Day 1 I wouldn't let anyone go unnommed". A valid strategy for someone who knows they will have a lot of popularity based support. Only thing that eclipses that is someone who has a claim to have played better than you, so if everyone was nominated, no big deal.
That all makes sense. But by Kiara's own admission, Kiara failed at this goal. 2 unnommed in Final 5, and Kiara didn't manage to get them both nominated. It's a risky game to play, and now there's someone unnommed in finals. That's a total mission failure, I'd say. If your goal from Day 1 was "no one goes unnommed" and someone goes unnommed...
How good of a game could you really have played?
Comments
Well it’s hard to play vs premades and people who wanted to add flavoring to my already popping pussy
Kiara_xoxo you werent flavored. No offense. You were nominated against Nate, who isn't popular and Tcold..... Your only scary nom was against FireX but we all knew u were beating him even then too. You weren't nommed back to back either. You were not flavored.
Blaming premades is a very lazy excuse when it comes down to final 5. At that point, people won't vote for themselves, and can't vote for the evicted player.
So you have 3 possible people to vote for, and 2 votes. That means no premade can stand alone without voting someone in. There's moves to be made and wedges to drive between people.
I get you had no control all game because you were outside the alliance but surely there's a move to be made Final 7 6 5 leading up to the endgame.