Finally. "The sperm that couldn't find the egg.", the famous word of Wil Heuseer. Ranking these winners has made me realize how many truly bad winners there are. Every winner is meant to win their season, but some are worse than others. I'm sure a lot of people were expecting Adam sometime soon and TBH he was supposed to be 27th, but I kept pushing him up further, realizing that his game wasn't THAT bad.
Adam won 2 HOH's and 1 POV during his season. That isn't a lot, but I don't really think he needed to win many competitions. He is ranked a bit higher than most because during both of his HOH reigns, he managed to take out Chelsia and James, arguably the biggest competitors in the trash we call BB9. These were 2 very smart moves, but he loses some brownie points due to James not actually being his target (Idk why).
Socially, he was pretty impressive. He was aligned with Ryan, Sheila and Natalie and the connections all got him far into the game. The one thing that really bothers me about his game was that despite it being played on pairs, his relationship with Sheila was so bad that they nominated each during their HOH reigns. You'd think in a game where you're forced to play in pairs, you'd have a semi-good relationship with your partner. Yup, that's why I don't expect much from recent seasons of BB US.
He ask spent majority of the endgame targeting Sharon. SHARON!?!?! That was not beneficial for his game. In Final 6, he nominated Sheila and Sharon (the 2 weakest in competitions), leaving off James (who had won 3 consecutive POV's) and not considering the fact that if James won POV again, he'd be ruining his whole game. Adam was only nominated three times and was good socially, but he just had some inconsistent gameplay and no set plans. He also got arrested for starting an illegal drug business with his money. *face palm*
Comment to be tagged, share your thoughts and guess who #22 is!!!
FireX if you think about it the other way around, he made himself a target in Week 1, which is just plain dumb. It's one thing if you're strategic and winning comps. But Steve was just there winning when he was targeted, not having much of a strategy of any sort.
Birks4444 he was a target because people thought he would be a easy eviction and dude won pov and on top of he played UTR in a game was crazy AF. Anyone else was targeted later on amd steve ALWAYS won when he needed to. I belive he did more then this winner and quite a couple more but hey thats me
FireX I respect your opinion but in my opinion he didn't do much. There's a lot of things I don't mention on these rankings. I don't think he played UTR, he just didn't do anything.
Let's not forget the THREE biggest blips of his game. Taking out Jackie and Julia (and John) lmao. Jackie leaving was the worst move possible for him and Julia was the worst overall competitor in the Final 6. John was his closest ally and he went during his Final 4 HOH Reign.
I know your not a fan of social games, but Big Brother is A SOCIAL GAME. That is the foundation of it and Steve sucked at that. Saving yourself multiple times is irrelevant when being compared to someone who is making connections and building strong relationship and isn't even put in the nomination chair.
Comps guarantee you one Week of safety, while social gameplay gets you far into the game.
Well all i will say his steve won by doing what he did and you may think its a bad move but you never tell. Steve played a good game and i 100% belive he made the right moves. He actually had to face tough competition and beat them. Yea his start gane was bad but considering his PERSONALITY and what he over came thats impressive
Also i play a social game a lot. I just belive in comps more because they show what kind of player you are
cswaggerr
MJFJUNE
Amnesia_
danyyboy67